“X-Men: Days of Future Past” (2014)
(updated 5/28/14 – added to continuity issues)
Rated: PG- 13 for sequences of intense sci-fi violence and action, some suggestive material, nudity and language
Runtime: 2 hours, 11 minutes
My spoiler-free review:
In the modern superhero movie genre audiences have come to expect big action sequences, cool costumes and makeup, a compelling story, great visual effects, and good writing/acting, “X-Men: Days of Future Past” gets an “A” on most of these categories, but with some of the dialogue and acting just average for this genre plus a running time past 2 hours… I give it 7.5 out of 10… its really good, but I had my hopes high with the return of Director Bryan Singer (“X-Men” and “X-Men 2″) plus the combination of original cast and returning cast with time traveling had me expecting the next great superhero movie, but it fell short of that sky high expectation.
Warning: the movie is not for little kids as it is Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense sci-fi violence and action, some suggestive material, nudity and language
We’ve come so far since the 1978′s “Superman: The Movie” laid the path then 2000′s “X-Men” made the genre legit… superhero movies are now the biggest summer budget blockbusters are we’re getting several of them each year (at least 4 in 2014, 5 in 2013, 3 in 2012). So when the franchise that really started the golden age of superhero movies comes back bigger (cast and budget) you expect it to be better than ever.
Don’t get me wrong this movie is really really good, but not great… I liked the action, the effects, the overall story, the appearances of characters, the time traveling, but in 2014 I expect more from my superhero movies than I did in the 2000s. This is the biggest ensemble cast of superhero characters ever – I counted 20 supers in all (plus the non-super supporting characters). The cast boasts about a dozen actors who have won/been nominated for Oscars, Golden Globes, Emmys, or Tonys. You can’t just bring back Singer, the original cast, the cast of “X-Men: First Class” (2011), and some new characters and time travel between 2023 and 1973 and call it good… you have to give those award caliber actors interesting things to say and do! Not just sit or stand around… c’mon Singer you directed the genius movie “The Usual Suspects” (1995), one of my favorite movies of its kind! You know that even a few good lines of dialogue can make a good actor better and a great actor amazing. A few stanzas of Professor Xavier speeches aren’t enough…. all the actors we expect to be interesting need to be interesting… not just window dressing via a nostalgic cameo.
Continuity with other X-Men films: A bigger issue was the problem inherent with the franchise, not just with this installment. Constantly trying to resolve in my mind the events of “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” (2009), “X-Men: The Last Stand” (2006), and “The Wolverine” (2013) and how they fit with this movie was an act of patience and frustration. The Professor X in the future doesn’t fit with the events of “Last Stand”. Bolivar Trask in DOFP vs X3. Xavier/Magneto/Mystique relationship in past versus X1, X2, X3. Future Wolverine’s claws. Director Singer recognized errors in continuity in a May 14 article, saying “Some of these I hope the audience will forget about…”. Really? A franchise rebooted with pop icon characters that you’ve built up during a 14 year period and you want us to forget ‘some of these‘ things. Seriously, I want to drop my rating a full point for that! Changing the actor who played Pyro between X1 and X2…okay. Maybe I can accept the 4 different ages of/actors playing Stryker in “Origins: Wolverine” (2009), ”First Class” (2011), X2, and the 1970s Stryker portrayed in this movie don’t fit together. But the chronological issues created by “Origins: Wolverine” (2009) or “Last Stand” (2006) and even “The Wolverine” (2013) have to be addressed somewhere on screen!! My only acceptable explanation, but it wasn’t on screen: that “First Class” and “Days of Future Past” have created a different timeline that we are now on.
Other issues: I also had problems with what Ellen Page’s ‘Kitty Pride’ can do in this movie… her performance was fine, but in talking to my Marvel experts (“nerds” or “geeks” to some), she never had the abilities she does in this movie.
But… Singer did a good job trying to undo the damage and problems with those non-Singer movies tying up many of the loose ends (not all) and trying to point the future/past on a different trajectory. Now that I’ve seen the movie, the second watch may be easier knowing that many of the “problems” are fixed on the space time continium.
Also… the gravity of the apocalyptic future is clear with the mortality of some characters showing us just how important the time traveling mission needs to be successful. Its something rarely seen in these movies and the comics. The scenes with Quicksilver are great, well thought out and executed, especially the big action sequence… which is probably the scene that evokes the most pure fun for me. There were a lot of little inside jokes and things that tied this movie and the others together plus some comic relief, but the sub-par dialogue/acting, the ominous tone and some briefly explained plot devices keep this movie from being one of the best of it’s kind.
MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)