Review: “Amazing Spider-man 2″ bigger than it should have been

May 2nd, 2014 at 8:23 am by under Entertainment
"The Amazing Spider-man 2" poster courtesy Columbia Pictures

“The Amazing Spider-man 2″ poster courtesy Columbia Pictures

“The Amazing Spider-Man 2″ (2014)
Rated: PG-13 for sequences of sci-fi action/violence
Runtime: 2 hours, 22 minutes
Genre: Action/Adventure/ComicBook/Superhero

My spoiler-free review:

The vision for this Spider-man movie was just too grandiose.  Too many villians, subplots, and slow-motion action sequences, this easily could have been two movies… or one very long music video.

The action is great, the acting is really good, and dealing with three villians while dealing with personal issues does create some serious challenges for our friendly neighborhood web slinger… but it loses the focus and charm that the last one had in 2012.  Sure for comic book fans its keeps pretty close to the comics (I’m told) and its original enough to keep the fanboys’ interest (introducing several of the ‘Sinister Six’ lineup).  I was entertained, but the web was just too full and had too many music video-like slow-mo action sequences for me to say its better than the 2012 version… I give it 7.0 out of 10 … its worth seeing on the big screen, but save some bucks and skip the 3-D or more expensive formats.

In his defense, Director Marc Webb (“The Amazing Spider-Man” (2012), “(500) Days of Summer” (2009)) got his start in and continues directing music videos and documentaries, and I like both of his other big screen movies very much, but the three villains, the issues Peter Parker is dealing with after the events of the last movie, his personal drama with girlfriend Gwen Stacy and Aunt May, his estranged parents, was just too ambitious.  I give Webb and the writers and the cast and crew credit for trying, but it was just too much.

I know.  I know.  The fans want more… then I say something like that.  The acting was really good, something we’ve started to expect and enjoy, but still need to appreciate how this genre has changed in 30 years.  (mild spoilers if you don’t know the comics and/or haven’t seen any teasers for the movie)  Andrew Garfield is really more like the Spider-man of the comics with his youthful confidence and comedy as he tries to appeal to the public as a good guy, not a vigilante… but at the same time he shows us the weighty internal struggles that Peter Parker is dealing with from his past and the present.  Emma Stone is more than just a damsel in distress as Gwen Stacy, she’s headstrong but sweet and caring.  Sally Field gets to show more range of her acting in this chapter as well as the concerned Aunt May but there’s a lot more going on with her this time around.   Then we get three Oscar-caliber actors as the three new villains: Jamie Foxx (Max Dillon/Electro), Paul Giamatti (Aleksei Sytsevich/Rhino), and Dane DeHaan (Harry Osborn/Green Goblin).  Foxx’s character really becomes charged up after he takes on his new persona, DeHaan shines as the socially awkward and steaming mad son of Oscorp’s founder, but Giamatti mostly just yells, snorts, and destroys things.

This second chapter in this “Amazing” franchise has significantly more action and is darker like many other successful sequels, plunging Spider-man into a lot of trouble and a lot of emotional upheaval.  And these new villains at the same time create a lot more peril for our hero than just the one we got in the last, which was stronger, but more of a personal conflict for Peter than being outmatched.

Sometimes when you have a good thing going, you gotta save a little for the next outing… maybe the scenes with Harry Osborn are merely a tease… maybe the extra ending stuff with Aleksei Sytsevich could have been more of an extra scene in the credits (like other marvel movies, teasing ahead to the next movie and the “Sinister Six”).  I don’t know, but it felt like the filmmakers, maybe were under intense pressure from the studio (Columbia Pictures, owned by Sony) to build their version of blockbuster superhero team-up movies like, but separate (because of copyrights) from Disney’s “The Avengers” (2012) or Fox’s “X-Men: First Class” (2011).  Either way this movie was fun and exciting and does set up for more sequels and spinoffs if that’s what the studio wants.  We get some direct and indirect references to ‘The Sinister Six’ with ‘Green Goblin’, ‘Rhino’, “Electro’, ’Doctor Octopus’, ‘Vulture’, plus ‘Lizard’ is still out there and apparently ‘Kraven the Hunter’ and ‘Mysterio’ were also teased via the Shazam app during the credits.

But sometimes business can get in the way of great filmmaking…. more isn’t always better and the music montages combined with too many slow-mo sequences wore thin… one of each would have been successful but too many times and it loses its uniqueness … even for Spider-man.


PS – at our screening, the “X-Men: Days of Future Past” (Fox) teaser was not attatched, maybe because Sony, the company behind Spider-man was not going to promote another company’s product during screenings that Fox isn’t footing the bill for.  That teaser doesn’t necessarily mean a crossover between the two properties, here’s the deal reported by Variety in a nutshell: Director Marc Webb was under contract at Fox Searchlight to do another movie after “(500) Days of Summer” and to make both sides happy after the 2012 Spider-man movie, Sony (Columbia Pictures) agreed to let Fox promote their new X-Men movie at the end of this Spider-man movie.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Geek out: Star Wars 7 cast announcement!!!

April 29th, 2014 at 7:28 pm by under Entertainment
"Star Wars" logo courtesy Lucasfilm

“Star Wars” logo courtesy Lucasfilm

(UPDATED 4/30/14)

Tuesday Lucasfilm and Disney announced what Star Wars fans were waiting for… the main cast for the next episode in the Star Wars franchise: “Star Wars: Episode VII”… 5 days before international Star Wars Day (May 4th… ’may fourth be with you’).


Episode 7 is the current working title for the movie, which is supposed to be set 30-35 years after the end of “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” (1983)(Episode 6).  It is planned to be the first of three new Star Wars movies… following the children of Luke, Han, and Leia and the next generation of heroes in the Star Wars universe.

The production is being led by Director J.J. Abrams, who ironically brought us the last two Star Trek movies.  The script was written by Abrams and “Star Wars: Empire Strikes Back” (1980) screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan.  Filming is set to begin in May, but there are rumors that some filming has already started and is supposed to take place in England’s Pinewood Studios and in rumored locations in the Middle East.  Star Wars creator George Lucas will act as creative consultant.  Academy Award-winning composer John Williams will be back to compose the music for the film.

Disney plans for the movie to hit theaters December 18, 2015… 32 years after “Jedi” blew up the box office. Episode 8 is scheduled for 2017 while Episode 9 is scheduled for 2019.   There are also planned spinoff films to release between the main movies, but the character focus of those movies has not yet been announced.

"Star Wars Episode VII" script read courtesy Lucasfilm

“Star Wars Episode VII” script read courtesy Lucasfilm

The main cast is a mix of new comers: John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Andy Serkis, Domhnall Gleeson, and Max von Sydow.  The only role we know is that Driver (“Girls”) was cast as “the villain”.  We do not yet know the name of the character or his affiliation to the force… or the old Empire, Rebellion, etc.  The rest of the new-to-Star Wars cast includes some familiar faces: veteran actor Max von Sydow (“Minority Report”, “The Exorcist”), Andy Serkis (“Lord of the Rings” and “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”), Oscar Isaac (“Inside Llewyn Davis”), Domhnall Gleeson (“About Time”, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1&2″) and John Boyega (“Attack the Block”).  Ridley is a newcomer, just starting her acting career last year in the U.K.

And the returning cast: Harrison Ford (Han Solo), Carrie Fisher (Princess Leia), Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker), Anthony Daniels (C-3PO), Peter Mayhew (Chewbacca), and Kenny Baker (R2-D2).   Notably absent is Billy Dee Williams (Lando Calrissian).


The returning cast members range in age from 57-79 years old: Harrison Ford (71) is rumored to play a “gigantic” part in this movie as Han Solo.  Carrie Fisher (57) reprises her role as Leia (likely dropping the ‘Princess’ title).  Mark Hamill (62) returns as Luke Skywalker, the only known surviving Jedi of the bunch at the end of Episode 6 so he’ll likely mentor the young Jedi in this movie.  Peter Mayhew (69) returns as the 7’2″ Chewbacca and best friend of Solo.  Anthony Daniels (68) is back as the protocol droid C-3PO, he and Kenny Baker (79) as R2-D2 are the only actors in the credits of all 6 of the Star Wars movies made so far!

John Boyega courtesy IMDB

John Boyega courtesy IMD

John Boyega is rumored to play a young Jedi (in the script read photo above he is sitting next to Oscar Isaac on the left side of the photo approximately 10 o’clock)

He is 22-years old

Boyega is a British actor born in London

Best known for ”Attack the Block” (2011) and “My Murder” (2012)

Upcoming movie: “Imperial Dreams”  (2014) – ironic title, I know!

He is 5’7″

Daisy Ridley courtesy IMDB

Daisy Ridley courtesy IMDB

Daisy Ridley is rumored to play either a descendant of Obi-Wan Kenobi or Han Solo and Princess Leia’s daughter, Jaina Solo from the Expanded Universe books, however Disney and Lucasfilm recently announced that much of the expanded universe would be dissolved like Palpatine did to the Imperial Senate “the last remnants of the old republic” were “swept away”

(click on the script read photo above to make it bigger – she is sitting between Harrison Ford (Han) and Carrie Fischer (Leia) about 2 o’clock – either a picture is worth a thousand words, or this is an incredible coincidence)

Her actual age is not currently public info, but Ridley’s rep based in London’s official website says the actress’ ‘playing age’ is 16 to 20

She only started acting last year, beginning with guest roles on British TV shows like “Youngers” and “Mr Selfridge” and acting in short films.  Her first movie role will be in “Inbetweeners 2″ (August 6 in the UK and Ireland)

Ridley is 5’7″

Adam Driver courtesy IMDB

Adam Driver courtesy IMDB

Adam Driver was announced in February as the main villain of the movie, while we don’t have a name, the one thing we were told is that the character is said to be in the vein of iconic “Star Wars” villain Darth Vader

He is a 30-year old American actor

Since 2012, Driver has portrayed Adam Sackler on the HBO series ‘Girls’, but he has also appeared in several recent movies: “Inside Llewyn Davis” (2013) and “Frances Ha Frances Ha” (2012)

He is 6’3″

(in the script read photo above he is sitting about 11 o’clock looking to his right at Boyega and Isaac)


Oscar Isaac courtesy IMDB

Oscar Isaac courtesy IMDB


Oscar Isaac is playing an unknown character at this point

He is an 35-year old American actor and singer born in Guatemala, who was raised in Miami, Florida

Last year he received a Golden Globe nomination for Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy for his role in “Inside Llewyn Davis” (2013)

Isaac is also known for “Drive” (2011), “Robin Hood” (2010)

He is 5’9″

(in the script read photo above he is sitting about 9 o’clock between Boyega and Serkis, who is wearing glasses and reading the script)

Andy Serkis courtesy IMDB

Andy Serkis courtesy IMDB

Andy Serkis is playing an unknown character at this point, but we also don’t know if he’ll be in a suit, acting via motion capture, or showing his face in the movie

He is a 50-year old English film actor, director and author born in London

Serkis is a performance capture veteran best known for playing Gollum in “The Lord of the Rings” movies (2001-2003) and “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” (2012), he also played Caesar in “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” (2011) through newer motion capture technology

He also appeared on camera in movies such as “Inkheart” (2008), “The Prestige” (2006), “13 Going on 30″ (2004)

He is 5′ 8″

(in the script read photo above he is sitting about 9 o’clock wearing glasses and reading the script, Mark Hamill and Anthony Daniels are to his right)

Domnhall Gleeson courtesy IMDB

Domnhall Gleeson courtesy IMDB

Domhnall Gleeson is playing an unknown character at this point

He is a 30-year old an Irish actor, director, and writer from Dublin, Ireland

He is the son of actor Brendan Gleeson

Best known for his roles in “About Time” (2013), “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2″ (2011), “True Grit”  (2010), and “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1″ (2010)

Gleeson is 6′ 1″

(in the script read photo above he is sitting about 6 o’clock sitting in his own chair with his back to us to the right of Anthony Daniels in the plaid shirt)


Max von Sydow courtesy IMDB

Max von Sydow courtesy IMDB

Max von Sydow is playing an unknown character at this point, and he’ll bring some veteran acting credibility to the film just like Alec Guinness and Peter Cushing brought to “Star Wars: A New Hope” (1977)

He is an 85-year old Swedish actor

He has 2 Oscar nominations: Actor in a Leading Role – “Pelle erobreren” (1987) and Actor in a Supporting Role – “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close” (2011)

von Sydow has more than 100 acting credits, including: “The Exorcist” (1973), “Minority Report” (2002), ”Shutter Island” (2010), “Robin Hood” (2010), “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close” (2011), plus he’s no stranger to Sci-Fi and big budget films: “Flash Gordon” (1980), “Conan the Barbarian” (1982), and “Dune” (1984).

(von Sydow is not pictured in the script read photo above)

There are rumors and anticipation that another big announcement regarding the movie will take place on May 4th, of course known to fans worldwide as Star Wars day… maybe the title?  Character names? Additional cast? (Ian McDiarmid and Ewan McGregor are rumored for cameos)  More filming locations?  We’ll have to wait to see!

The Official Announcement:

The Star Wars team is thrilled to announce the cast of Star Wars: Episode VII.

Actors John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Andy Serkis, Domhnall Gleeson, and Max von Sydow will join the original stars of the saga, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, Anthony Daniels, Peter Mayhew, and Kenny Baker in the new film.

Director J.J. Abrams says, “We are so excited to finally share the cast of Star Wars: Episode VII. It is both thrilling and surreal to watch the beloved original cast and these brilliant new performers come together to bring this world to life, once again. We start shooting in a couple of weeks, and everyone is doing their best to make the fans proud.”

Photo gallery of the casting announcement: http://interactives.woodtv.com/photomojo/gallery/12018/1/

I met Peter Mayhew (Chewbacca) in 2008:

Aaron with Peter Mayhew in Grand Rapids at Celebration! North 12-6-08

Aaron with Peter Mayhew in Grand Rapids at Celebration! North 12-6-08

And Anthony Daniels (C-3PO) in 2010:

Aaron and Anthony Daniels on the set of eightWest at WOODTV Studios in Grand Rapids 7-13-10

Aaron and Anthony Daniels on the set of eightWest at WOODTV Studios in Grand Rapids 7-13-10

And I got to interview him on eightWest that day (click link to watch)!



So what did you think?  Please post a comment! (more…)

Review: “Heaven is for Real” is a test of faith

April 24th, 2014 at 10:57 pm by under Entertainment
"Heaven is for Real" poster courtesy Sony Pictures Releasing

“Heaven is for Real” poster courtesy Sony Pictures Releasing

“Heaven is for Real” (2014)
Rated: PG thematic material including some medical situations
Runtime: 1 hour, 40 minutes
Genre: Drama/Family

My spoiler-free review:

“Heaven is for Real” is a cute and funny story about some heavy subject matter – life and death and what happens after… its all handled with care in the movie based on the New York Times best-selling book about the true story of a boy that tells his experience of visiting heaven.  The movie sets a new bar for small budget* faith-based movies to aspire to – with a solid script, good acting, likeable characters, and not overly preachy… I give it 7.5 out of 10.
Its a faith challenging movie, and if you let it, a faith inspiring story.

You just can’t help but smile at Connor Corum.

For a 6-year-old (playing 4-year-old Colton), he’s got a lot of charisma and can hold the audience with his maturity next to a veteran actor combined with his innocence of youth and his character’s “faith like a child”.  Connor is a good little actor, looking comfortable with several lines of dialogue at a time and at ease with on screen dad Greg Kinnear, the two clearly have good father-son chemistry.

Kinnear shines as Todd Burpo, Colton’s father and small town pastor of the Wesleyan Church in Imperial, Nebraska.  Kinnear aptly depicts the doubt, the dilemma as a preacher, and the challenge his family and church face in believing or not believing what Colton says happened to him.  Kinnear’s Pastor Todd is very personable, very good at his job, a great speaker until he faces physical, emotional, and major career adversity.

Pastor Todd, his wife Sonja (Kelly Reilly), daughter Cassie (Lane Styles), and the church deal with this adversity in different ways.  Thomas Haden Church adds depth and dry comic relief as Pastor Todd’s best friend ‘Jay’, while Margo Martindale is solid as hard nosed church board member and piano player ‘Nancy’.

While its surprising how quickly some members of the church react negatively to Colton’s story, all the characters represent a theme of how people react to things that challenge them – some literal, some figurative, some are inspired, some are afraid, others confused for different reasons, Pastor Todd surmises – “some may be afraid there is no heaven… or they’re afraid there is”.  The sermons that Todd preaches ironically apply to what they are going through and once he realizes he needs to listen to his own teachings, his character, the last you’d suspect would need to change, goes through several changes during the movie.

Director Randall Wallace does a good job presenting Colton’s experience in heaven as a true event that happened, not some fantastical special effects wizardry with flash and fireworks, the tone of it makes sense – important, yet humbling.

But to say that “Heaven is for Real” is a movie just for Christians is a shame.  Sure its a story presented in a away that will be best received by believers, but its also a message about family and community, appreciating and respecting the people around you, and letting people know they’re not alone in whatever struggles they are dealing with in life… something that everyone can understand.

While the movie tries to present Colton’s family as a normal middle america non-Biblical family highlighted with a cute scene where the singing in the car goes from “This Little Light of Mine” to “We Will Rock You”, it also goes a little too far with spicing up the husband-wife relationship both in conversation and wardrobe.   I also had some troubles accepting the true depth of the financial hardship depicted in the movie.  Some scenes are a little predictable.   But its still a solid family and/or faith-based movie.

*estimated budget: $12 million

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Casting call: “Batman vs. Superman” in Troy, MI

April 18th, 2014 at 7:01 pm by under Entertainment
Official Logo for Batman vs Superman movie courtesy Warner Bros.

Official Logo for Batman vs Superman movie courtesy Warner Bros.

Do you want to be in Michigan’s biggest budget movie project yet?

The call has gone out to adults interested in joining the cast of the “Man of Steel” (2013) sequel, referred to as “Batman vs. Superman” that will begin filming this summer in the Detroit area through November.

Producers are looking for men and women, 18 years and older that are “clean cut military and law enforcement types and business executives in suits” and they stress, in all caps “NO COSTUMES PLEASE!”  They say you need to be able to work in the Detroit area both indoors and outside during weekdays “anytime between June-November 2014″.  Time and location details are below.

The movie was approved in August 2013 for $35 million in incentives as its expected to spend $131 million in Michigan and hire 406 area workers.  ”Batman vs. Superman” is scheduled to be released May 6, 2016.  In addition to being a sequel to “Man of Steel” that rebooted the Superman story, this movie is part of Warner Bros. plan to setup a Justice League team-up of DC Comics characters, much like Disney did with Marvel Comics characters in “The Avengers” (2012).  ”Batman vs. Superman” stars Henry Cavill (Clark Kent / Superman), Ben Affleck (Bruce Wayne / Batman), Amy Adams (Lois Lane), Gal Gadot (Diana Prince / Wonder Woman), Diane Lane (Martha Kent), Jesse Eisenberg (Lex Luthor), Jeremy Irons (Alfred), Laurence Fishburne (Perry White), and Holly Hunter.

The Michigan Film Office posted this, so consider it official:


This specific casting call is for clean cut military and law enforcement types and business executives in suits over 18 yrs., male and female.


MUST be available to work in Detroit area locations, week days, either inside or outside, anytime between June-November 2014.

Photos will be taken at no charge, please bring a pen for application & absolutely, NO KIDS at casting call. If you’d like to submit kids ages 9-15, please bring small current school type picture.

Sunday, April 27, 2014
11:00 am -3:00 pm
(Last person MUST be in line by 3 pm before line cuts off!)
Please no early line ups & NO PHONE CALLS!!

Somerset Inn/North Entrance
2601 W. Big Beaver Road, Troy, MI 48084

Park in lot along Big Beaver Rd., enter North side
Please do not disturb this business and NO PHONE CALLS!!

Previous post: (more…)

Review: “Rio 2″ is fun for the family

April 18th, 2014 at 7:42 am by under Entertainment
"Rio 2" poster courtesy Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

“Rio 2″ poster courtesy Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

“Rio 2” (2014)
Rated: G
Runtime: 1 hour, 41 minutes
Genre: Animation/Adventure/Comedy/Family

My spoiler-free review:

Right on par with the first “Rio”, we get more of the birds and other animals and less of the people… and interesting storyline with enough to keep both kids and adults entertained.  It is a little long for its target audience, but its cute and fun for the whole family… I give it 7.0 out of 10… a movie about families for families.

Now that they’re a family with an extended family of other birds and animal friends plus their human protectors, Blu and Jewel are living comfortably in the sanctuary as the only known blue spix macaws remaining.  The endangered status makes them naturally protective of their kids, but Jewel (Anne Hathaway) seems more concerned than Blu (Jesse Eisenberg) that the kids are growing up too much like humans with modern conveniences and plush accommodations… she wants to get outside in the jungle and get away from technology.  Their three little fledglings (Carla, Bia, Tiago) all have unique personalities reflective of their parents, with the oldest of the three acting like a teenager.  Everything seems to be okay until they learn they may not actually be the only survivors of their species… and they once again run into the vengeful cockatoo Nigel (Jemaine Clement) and his new associates including Gabi the tree frog (Kristin Chenoweth).

What follows is a story that could be simplified as just a heartwarming family adventure with a message about the dangers of deforestation in the Amazon.

But its more than that, there’s lots of colorful images and memorable characters and many fun songs for the kids plus some laughs and a storyline interesting enough for adults.

The movie is well crafted it looks great and its well conceived with solid writing, the voice cast is great, its a little darker in tone than the first, but its understandably predictable and the musical numbers are fairly forgettable after a few hours.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

New movies on video 4-14-14

April 15th, 2014 at 7:05 am by under Entertainment

New movies on Blu-ray, DVD, VOD, etc. 4-14-14:

“Ride Along” (PG-13)
(Kevin Hart, Ice Cube)
“The Nut Job” (PG)
(Will Arnett, Liam Neeson)
“The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” (PG)
(Ben Stiller, Kristen Wiig)
“Philomena” (PG-13)
(Judi Dench, Steve Coogan)
“Black Nativity” (PG)
(Forest Whitaker, Angela Bassett)
“Better Living Through Chemistry” (R)
(Sam Rockwell, Olivia Wilde )
“Copperhead” (PG-13)
(Billy Campbell, Peter Fonda)
“Great Expectations” (PG-13)
(Helena Bonham Carter, Ralph Fiennes)
“The Invisible Woman” (R)
(Felicity Jones, Ralph Fiennes)
“Date and Switch” (R)
(Dakota Johnson, Sarah Hyland)
“Mobius” (R)
(Jean Dujardin, Tim Roth )
“Mallrats” (R) – first time on Blu-Ray

Last Week 4-7-14: (more…)

Review: “Draft Day” scouting report – NFL fans should wait

April 11th, 2014 at 12:01 am by under Entertainment
"Draft Day" poster courtesy Summit Entertainment

“Draft Day” poster courtesy Summit Entertainment

“Draft Day” (2014)
Rated: PG-13 on appeal for brief strong language and sexual references
Runtime: 1 hour, 49 minutes
Genre: Sports Drama

My spoiler-free review:

As a huge fan of NFL football, a long-time fan of a struggling team, and somewhat of a draft nerd, I really wanted to like this movie.  Even though it appeals to more than just football fans, with its behind-the-scenes of NFL drama, its no “Moneyball” (2011) and certainly not Kevin Costner’s best sports movie.  Setting this movie at the upcoming 2014 draft caused it to have too many factual issues which challenged my ability to believe a movie that tries so hard to be realistic.  I give it 6.0 out of 10.  This may actually play better for moviegoers who are not pro football fans.

Warning to parents: the movie is rated PG-13 on appeal for brief strong language and sexual references

Since this movie was filming several months before the start of the 2013 NFL, it makes sense that the filmmakers wouldn’t know the outcome of the season, and wouldn’t know which team would have the pivotal number one pick in the 2014 draft.  However, why did you choose the Seattle Seahawks?  Sure the franchise has never won a Super Bowl and for years (I have been a fan since 1984) they were a team in the top or middle of the draft, having missed the playoffs for many years.  But the rebuilding is over and they have been a more likely playoff team recently, and were a 2014 preseason favorite by many analysts.

I’m not bothered that the writers made my favorite team the “villain” of the movie… its that they set the draft of this movie in the present months from now at the 2014 draft… and in the movie the Seahawks have that number one pick and are willing to make a trade with the Cleveland Browns, the team that Kevin Costner is running as the General Manager.  But in the real world 2014 draft… the Houston Texans have the first pick and the Seahawks have the 32nd pick.   Everyone who pays attention to the draft knows that, barring an earlier trade, the team with the worst record in the league gets the first pick, not the team that just won the Super Bowl.  Also, in the movie, the general manager of the Seahawks wants the hottest prospect in the draft, a quarterback.  Anyone who watched the NFL playoffs or the Super Bowl knows that Seattle doesn’t need a quarterback, we’re just fine with Russell Wilson.  There are also moves made on the day of the draft because of players they have on their team that conflict with real players on their team.  Like the characters saying the Denver Broncos wouldn’t take a quarterback because they have (?) Garrett.  I’m sorry, but does the writer know that they have future Hall of Famer Peyton Manning?

So the first advice for anyone who wants to do a movie pulling back the curtain on how NFL teams work… set it in the not-so-distant future where the draft selection and the players on the team could make more sense.  The movie is trying to be real, but lives in a fictional alternate universe set in the present, because the movie uses fictional players currently on the team and as college prospects, but still tries to be authentic by using real retired players, real NFL media, and the real commissioner.   ”Draft Day” doesn’t feel as real as a behind-the-scenes movie about a professional sports team’s General Manager (GM), the way “Moneyball” (2011) did.  The Brad Pitt film included real athletes and actors but using the names of real players, combined with actual footage and Brad Pitt was hidden inside his character, who was a real-life GM not a alternate universe fictional GM dealing with fictional players and fictional prospects.

As important as the day of the draft is, there’s more going on in the preseason leading up to that big day.  Some players on the roster are resigned at the end of the season, some become free agents, some get traded, some retire… the GM has to deal with all of these things and then tries to make some moves himself to fill the needs that might not be filled in the draft.  Then there’s the scouting and prepping for the draft … and not just the first round pick.  There are four days, 7 rounds of picks!  Some teams pick more than once in a round, but the average team has 7 picks total.  Many teams live and die with their first round picks, but many teams thrive making great picks AFTER the first round.  NFL nerds will know that.  This is your core audience.  The peripheral audience of casual fan, friends of fans, or dates of fans, might not… but who are you appealing to then?  ”Draft Day” does not address anything else in the off-season except focus on the first round of the draft.  I know the movie is called “Draft Day” so technically its about the first round, but a GM’s job is never done… he wouldn’t go off to his office after he makes his one pick, and he wouldn’t go to a party at the end of the first round… he has three more days, 6 more rounds to think about.

So enough about the football… I guess the movie’s strength has to focus on the drama… the relationship then, of the people involved in these make or break decisions regarding the franchise.  Costner is Costner.  Solid but very Costner.  This could have been one of many different Costner characters dropped in this role and he would act very similar.  His character wasn’t unique enough to separate him from the actor, so I had a hard time not seeing Costner when we see his character ‘Sonny Weaver, Jr.’.  The story is interesting… he has a challenging day, not only is the draft the beginning of a make or break season for him, everyone in his life is pulling at him for attention… his co-worker ‘Ali’ (Jennifer Garner), the owner (Frank Langella), his mom (Ellen Burstyn), Coach Penn (Dennis Leary), the other coaches and staff, and even his new intern ‘Rick’ (Griffin Newman).  Leary’s ‘Coach Penn’ is cliche.  Too cliche.  He puffs himself up, he’s the tough talking know it all that came from a bigger market and he’s got all the answers.  The executives helping with the draft are not all that smart.  The exception is ‘Ali’ (Garner) she is smart and knows football, and is good at her job, although we only get one real mention of what her job is and what that means (and the casual fan/non-fan may not even know what that is).  There is a lot of insider talk that goes unexplained assuming the audience knows what they’re talking about, meaning the casual fan may not understand the gravity of the dealings made during the movie.  So what’s left is a fairly interesting but completely fictional story which at least to football fans starts too become predictable during what is the most interesting part… the last 30 minutes of the movie.

But the movie does move along well and it does look good, with production elements are solid as it takes us around the league as ‘Sonny Weaver’ tries to make deals to make his team better.  Some of the best moments of the movie showcase what director Ivan Reitman has done in the past – humor – whether its subtle or overt, there is not enough of it… and too many of the characters are paper thin – with very little much depth, leaving the movie to win or lose on the success of its main characters and main cast, who are good, but not great.

Final word to the producers: just because you make it, doesn’t mean football fans will come.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Review: “Noah” departs from scripture for sake of story

April 6th, 2014 at 4:56 pm by under Entertainment
"Noah" poster courtesy Paramount Pictures

“Noah” poster courtesy Paramount Pictures

“Noah” (2014)
Rated: PG-13 for violence, disturbing images and brief suggestive content

Runtime: 2 hours, 18 minutes
Genre: Adventure/Drama

My not very spoiler-free review (sorry its vital to this review):

It’s often said that reading the book is better than the movie.  While I frequently prefer the latter, I would agree in this case that one should brush up on their Noah reading before or after watching Darren Aronofsky’s version of one of the biggest tales of the first book of the Bible.  The filmmakers take many liberties or Hollywood-izes parts of the story that it must be clear that this is based on the story, not a true-to-the-Bible theatrical version of the story.  This is not a substitute for Sunday school teachings!  The movie enriches what may have happened while on the Ark during the flood with a intriguing family drama in a post-apocalyptic setting, but its several jumps from accuracy making it jarring to watch at times… I give it 6.0 out of 10 … despite its controversy, it does promote conversation about Biblical tales.  I’m not here telling you what to believe… just what to expect when you see the movie.

Warning to parents: this is not for little kids with its PG-13 for violence, disturbing images and brief suggestive content

What tha?  I am sure that trying to depict the events leading up to the story of Noah, visually to audiences both domestic and foreign was a challenge Aronofsky had to know was going to be difficult.  So I accepted the visuals of the first few minutes of the movie as we get a backstory of Noah and the world he was living in before the biggest storm in history.  But then a scene involving a fantastical element of giant walking rock creatures that reminded me of the Ents in “Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers” (2002).  Yes.  That’s right, instead of a Charlton Heston-esque epic like “The Ten Commandments” (1956) we get more of a Peter Jackson/Steven Spielberg sci-fiction/fantasy retelling of a classic Bible story.  They are later explained to be this movie’s understanding of what the ‘watchers’ (fallen angels) are, but you lost me for more than 30 minutes before you explained what I was supposed to be seeing.

Plot details?  I also suspended belief and accepted the way the movie chose to visually present some of the supernatural events of this story that has been told with many interpretations throughout history.  Taking Noah’s story from Genesis 5:21-9:25, about 4 chapters or  several pages from the Bible and turning it into an epic-feature length movie is quite the undertaking but why take so many big steps to differentiate from a well published account of Noah?  Interpretation is one thing… but… what is going on here?

1) In the Bible, God talks to Noah about what is coming, but in the movie, its presented as dreams or visions
2) In the Bible, God gives Noah instructions on how to build the Ark, but in the movie, its not included
3) The Bible tells of Noah and his father, but in the movie, its portrayed with an abrupt difference
4) In the Bible, Noah’s grandfather is a mere lineage mention, but in the movie, Methuselah is in several scenes and he’s got supernatural magical powers
5) The Bible describes in detail how the animals were selected for the Ark, but in the movie, they just show up
6) In the Bible, it tells us that only 8 people are on the Ark (Noah and his wife, his three sons and their three wives), but in the movie, it omits two of the sons’ wives, and it’s a pretty big conflict in the movie between Noah and his second oldest son
7) In the Bible, only 8 survivors were on the Ark, but in the movie, it adds another survivor, and this is big because the ‘great flood’ was meant to cleanse the earth of the sinners and the lineage of Cain, but the movie depicts that very differently (avoiding spoiler)
8) In the Bible, Noah sent out a Raven to discover if the flood waters had receded enough to reveal dry land, but in the movie, his youngest son Japheth is the one sending out the birds on this mission
9) In the Bible, the rain continued for 40 days, but in the movie, it’s not really mentioned… throughout this story, the passage of time in Bible verses is more clear, while in the movie it’s I more vague
10) The Bible gives us two very important symbols at the end of the flood: the dove with the olive branch and the rainbow, but in the movie, they are just shown but never explained the significance of peace and that a flood would never again be used destroy the earth

Whether you take Noah as fact or as a myth, its jarring to see many of these plot points changed!

It does a pretty admirable job… trying to explain the events leading up to the great flood, like how the Ark was built and how Noah and his family were protected from the rest of the world (so the ‘watchers’ work in this version of the story).  Their visualization of how the materials were created for the Ark, how the animals got to the Ark and didn’t create problems on the Ark were all interesting.  I wish it showed more of the interaction with the animals inside the Ark, the people who thought Noah was crazy for building the Ark in the middle of a dry landscape, the flood waters rising, and the rush of the sea level lifting the Ark higher than mountains.  Unfortunately, some of these “explanations” created more questions than were “answered”.  While Aronofsky’s ‘Noah’ is more like Russell Crowe’s ‘Maximus’ in Gladiator (2000), which may be different than many pictured him, Crowe does a solid job portraying the strong willed faithful patriarch that is written in the screenplay.  The added/expanded character of Emma Watson’s ‘Ila’ adds a kinder, softer character to the group and to Noah’s character depth, whether or not is accurate is up for debate.  The rest of the cast including Jennifer Connelly, Anthony Hopkins, Logan Lerman, and Ray Winstone are good but its clearly not the acting that I had trouble with while watching this movie.

Yes there’s a message in the movie, but this is clearly not the same story I learned as a child.   These radical changes in plot are distractions from what had the makings of being a very solid movie based on a Biblical tale.  It didn’t have to sway so much from the original material just to appeal to the general public to make millions of dollars and attract both believers and non-believers… but it did and that’s too bad because there’s a pretty compelling story there already.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Review: “Captain America 2″ thrills with action and twists

April 3rd, 2014 at 8:01 pm by under Entertainment
"Captain America The Winter Soldier" poster courtesy Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

“Captain America The Winter Soldier” poster courtesy Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

“Captain America: The Winter Soldier” (2014)
(2D/ DBOX/ 3D/ IMAX )
Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence, gunplay and action throughout
Runtime: 2 hours, 16 minutes
Genre: Action/Adventure/Sci-Fi/Thriller

My spoiler-free review:

“Captain America: The Winter Soldier” offers more action, new characters, and lots of twists which you don’t get with a lot of action movies.  It’s a fun big-budget superhero movie that’s set in a political thriller.  It helps to have seen “Captain America: The First Avenger” (2011) and especially “The Avengers” (2012)  because this movie follows the events of the 2012 team up but ties back to the first movie about the super soldier.  With a lot of focus on the dealings of SHIELD, Nick Fury, Black Widow, and some new characters, it begs the question ‘who can you trust’?  I give it 8.9 out of 10.  I’m told comicbook fans will like it because it sticks pretty close to the comics even though filmmakers took some liberties with character details.

Warning for parents: with all the action and violence and loud noises, it may be too much for the little ones or even those who are a little skittish.

The “world’s greatest soldier” – that’s what SHIELD Director Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) calls Captain America/Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), but that doesn’t mean they see eye to eye about the moral decisions they are making in the name of protecting the public from terrorists and supervillians.  During the events of the “The Avengers” (2012) Cap’ started to become leery of SHIELD – the organization he was working for, but since he is a patriotic boy scout he’s kind of gone along with the program, until now when the latest version of the hellicarier (3 of them) is unveiled to him with technology that would make Tony Stark flinch… plus the rhetoric that SHIELD is spewing reminds Steve of a certain Nazi villain of his past.

There is more action in this second Captain America movie and a lot more conspiracy theories flying around involving SHIELD and the World Security Council (including Robert Redford’s character).  Captain America’s costume is updated, you’ll notice its mostly blue and white to fit him in with SHIELD… but we eventually get to see the classic red, white, and blue uniform… one of the biggest changes is his fighting style.  The Cap’ has clearly gotten some intense training since New York… with some new styles of hand to hand combat that accentuate his strength and abilities and some parkour.  This Captain America 2.0 is trying to adapt to life in the modern era but in battle, he’s a one man wrecking crew without all the dazzling technology of Iron Man or lightning from Thor… one of the first scenes that show us the new style of Captain Rogers is a gee whiz cool sequence that has him clearing off a bunch of mercenaries like rag dolls… but in that non-ruthless Captain American way.  We also get to see him with and without his trademark shield, which one bad guy calls him out on and he’s not always in uniform while battlting the bad guys… a hint that he isn’t just this character when he puts on the uniform.

There’s more screen time than before for Fury and Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) who spends a lot of time and is developing a chemistry with Captain America.   The additions of Sam Wilson (Anthony Mackie) and the Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan) take this movie up a notch… we get to see two of his longtime characters from the comics finally come to the big screen, as he develops and friendship with Sam and an intense rivarly with Winter Soldier.

The movie looks good, has the dark political conspiracy thriller undertones, coold SHIELD tech, and lots of one liners like  ”I only act like I know everything” (Black Widow), ”I’m 95 I’m not dead” (Captain America), and ”I do what he does, just slower” (Sam) – just to list a few.  And there are many pop culture references throughout, like ”War Games” (1983), a Pulp Fiction reference with Samuel L. Jackson’s character Nick Fury, Robert Redford’s commercial product, reference to the TV series ‘Community’ that the directors (Anthony and Joe Russo), and an actor from that show making a reference to “Top Gun” (1986).

But … I did have some problems with the movie, which I’ll try to make vague enough that they are spoiler-free: why does the leader of SHIELD, Nick Fury, with access to endless next generation technology not have a cell phone when he really needs it?  And why doesn’t he call on other well known members of SHIELD for help when he suspects big trouble? (see minor spoiler below)  There are a few plot holes and a red herring I was expecting but never materialized, but that would be a spoiler if I mentioned it here.

Okay fanboys (and fangirls) -  next are some minor spoilers about the new characters, references, and the two scenes in the credits (which you need to stay all the way to the end for), but you need to click the continuation link/scroll down for the minor spoilers….  (more…)

New movies on video 4-1-14

April 2nd, 2014 at 8:05 am by under Entertainment

New movies on Blu-ray, DVD, VOD, etc. 4-1-14

“Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues” (PG-13)
(Will Ferrell, Steve Carell)
“47 Ronin” (PG-13)
(Keanu Reeves, Hiroyuki Sanada)
“At Middleton” (R)
(Vera Farmiga, Taissa Farmiga )
“The Bag Man” (R)
(John Cusack, Robert De Niro)
“Knights of Badassdom” (R)
(Ryan Kwanten, Steve Zahn )
“The Little Rascals Save the Day” (PG)
(Valerie Azlynn, Doris Roberts )
“The Pirate Fairy” (G)
(Christina Hendricks, Tom Hiddleston )
“Seal Team 8: Behind Enemy Lines” (R)
(Tom Sizemore, Lex Shrapnel )

Last Week 3-25-14:
“The Wolf of Wall Street” (R)
“Walking with Dinosaurs” (PG)
“Delivery Man”  (PG-13)
“The Great Beauty” - Criterion Collection
“The Past”  (PG-13)
“Chinese Zodiac”  (PG-13)
“Free Ride”
“Odd Thomas”
“The Punk Singer” - Documentary
“The Truth About Emanuel”
“Welcome to the Jungle”

So what did you think?  Please post a comment! (more…)