Laff at the Movies

Review: “Pixels” premise is ridiculous, writing is sloppy, and humor is PG-13 BUT it’s not bad

July 24th, 2015 at 12:01 am by under Entertainment
"Pixels" courtesy Columbia Pictures

“Pixels” courtesy Columbia Pictures

“Pixels” (2015)
Rated: PG-13 for some language and suggestive comments
Runtime: 1 hour, 45 minutes
Genre: Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi

My spoiler-free review:

There’s a lot of original adventure, fun, and laughs in “Pixels”, but this could’ve been a much more family-friendly movie, however you can’t expect too much from an Adam Sandler comedy.  I wasn’t expecting much so the movie was a lot better than I expected.  There were a half-dozen suggestive sentences of dialogue and a large handful of bad words that the movie didn’t need.  Cutting out those things would make it a better movie for families and probably earn the movie a PG rating and a higher score from me.

So now you know going in this movie is not for most kids under 13… it’s really geared more for the adults that grew up in the 80s than the kids… even though it’s being marketed for the entire family.  I give it 6.5 out of 10.

Warning to parents: “Pixels” more than earns its PG-13 rating for quite a bit of bad language and a lot of suggestive comments

But its not terrible…. this is mostly a matter of marketing as a family movie and then not delivering a movie that is acceptable for a family with kids under 10.  The special effects are very good, getting things to look like the 16-bit or 8-bit graphics of the old video games.  While the effects and basic premise create wonder and fantasy for the younger crowd, the story and references to 1980s video arcade games will create nostalgia for those of us who grew up in that decade.  In addition to all the video games of the past: Frogger, PacMan, Donkey Kong, Defender, Centipede, Galaga, Asteroids, Space Invaders, Duck Hunt, Super Mario Bros, Joust, Tetris, Paper Boy, Dig Dug, etc., there are a ton of 80s pop culture refences.    Ronald Reagan, Olivia Newton John, the “Where’s The Beef” lady, Madonna, Hall and Oates, “Working for the Weekend”, Max Headroom, and Fantasy Island.  Plus lines like “arcades: in ancient times, they called in socializing”… “classic arcade games: do you mean like Halo and Call of Duty?”… and “I’m just a loser who’s good at old video games”.  There are some clearly new ideas shaping the plot and makes it a little less predictable… although we have a pretty good idea how its going to end.

Slow-mo at times, the story does grind to a crawl at times when trying to develop the romantic and interpersonal relationships in this movie.  While there are some cool elements for kids: the imagination inspiring possibility of video games coming to life and hanging out with Qbert or battling Centipede and Donkey Kong… the scenes in between are clunky, typical Sandler fare.  We get that the Peter Dinklage character ‘Eddie’ is unsavory, but I don’t need you to hit me over the head with it more than a dozen times… and many of the example are hugely inappropriate for younger viewers.  Its sad, with some family-focused editing and smoother script, this movie really could have been a fun family outing.

Wait for it… matinee pricing or home video rental… its an original adventure that’s fun for kids and nostalgic for adults and much better than I expected.  But for a movie all about family… its a movie that can’t be watched by all of the family.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers):


Review: “Ant-Man” is the funniest superhero movie ever

July 17th, 2015 at 12:30 am by under Entertainment
"Ant-Man" poster courtesy Disney/Marvel

“Ant-Man” poster courtesy Marvel Studios/Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

“Ant-Man” (2015)
Rated: PG-13 for sci-fi action violence
Runtime: 1 hour, 57 minutes
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi

My spoiler-free review:
A man in a leather suit with an insect-like helmet who can shrink down to miniature size, and ohh by the way – communicate with ants.  It may have been “astonishing” in 1962, but this superhero concept that could have come across as corny in 2015 is surprisingly cool thanks to director Peyton Reed, lead actor Paul Rudd, and a writing team that includes Adam McKay and Rudd himself.   Eventhough it doesn’t fit in the chronology of the comics that it’s based on, the movie does well to fit into the larger MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe), without being too heavy handed about it.

With its great laughs, intriguing family focused story, great character development, exciting adventure, and dazzling effects, “Ant-Man” is primed to be a surprise hit for both audiences and the studio it came from!!  I give it a 9.0 out of 10… Marvel gets the adventure comedy heist right delivering laughs, action, and family sentiment.  I haven’t had this much fun at an action movie since “The Avengers” (2012).

Worth the 3D – while there’s nothing really jumping out of the screen at you, its okay because the immersive aspect of the 3D really works for this movie, giving you depth of field when shrinking down to ant size

Not so serious – In a cinematic world with a patriotic super soldier, a hammer wielding Norse God, a scientist with Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde tendencies, and a billionaire with a high tech suit of armor… it may be hard to take the “Ant-Man” suit seriously.  So it makes perfect sense to have a comedic actor cast as the lead of “Ant-Man”… and the writing team to include two well know names behind hit comedy movies (McKay and Rudd).  This is the funniest superhero movie ever with genuine LOL moments – its not corny, dry, raunchy, or over-the-top humor… it has jokes for all ages and Ant-Man isn’t a snarky know-it-all like Tony Stark.  Scott Lang (Rudd) is a relatable family man, with funny comedy throughout – these are true laughs.  The movie “Ant-Man” doesn’t take itself too seriously- while the trailers constantly poke fun of the name of the suit – the movie also recognizes the oddity of the superpower and the science of it.

Founding member no more – in the Marvel comics, Dr. Hank Pym (original Ant-Man) was one of the first Avengers, but because of the way the movies were released, and the risk of introducing this character earlier in the MCU (see above)… the backstory had to change, so we start with a flashback more than 25 years to 1989.  I am a big fan of special effects, when done well, so I only mention them when they are great, or really bad.  The flashback scene is our first indication that the folks at ILM were taking this movie very seriously… with their ability to make Dr. Pym look like 1980s era Michael Douglas… and that amazing work continued throughout especially with the effects of shrinking and growing plus the interactions with ants and miniature Ant-Man.

Marvel blender mixes up another successful entry: pairing a legendary actor in Michael Douglas with the likable Rudd, positioned opposite the younger but overly aggressive businessman and the doctor’s daughter, with a very good script full of adventure, character development and humor, plus great effects and a feeling of fun… this movie is hard not to like!  Maybe it’s from what I’ve been reading since Iron Man (2008) hit the big screen or I’ve seen in animated TV series, but this movie feels familiar, eventhough these characters are not well known outside the comic book world.

Makes entomology cool – between Dr. Pym’s crash course in the different types of ants and how they can help Ant-Man, the winged ant dubbed “Antony” by Scott, and the little personality/sounds given to them – the movie makes ants fun and exciting for all ages.

Final battle is funny, in a good way there’s a scene involving the two insect-themed superbeings and a bug zapper, there’s two big laughs involving Thomas the Train, and while the battle in the bedroom looks like a play set of action figures come to life, its also quite funny for a fight scene.

Part of the MCU – “Ant-Man” ties in well with Avengers and other MCU movies (multiple references to Avengers on and off screen, several to Iron Man , one to Spider-man), sets up Scott joining with Avengers in the future and possibly positions him opposite of Iron Man in the next movie “Captain America: Civil War” (May 2016).

BONUS CONTENT IN CREDITS … there are 2 scenes in the credits that both look ahead and they are more than just Stark and Dr. Banner talking or a villain’s turn to the camera… there is some real meat to these impact of these “extra” scenes (because they are carefully planned by Marvel Studios).

The first is the MID CREDITS scene that looks ahead at Hope’s future in the MCU (anything more would be spoiler – happy to discuss in comments below, or on Twitter (@aaronlafferty).

Second is the END CREDITS scene featuring three characters from previous Marvel movies talking about what they are going to do given their situation and who might help them. (no names there because of spoiler impact… but if you’re a big picture MCU fan… then you must see this scene that is important to Phase 3 of the Marvel movies… happy to discuss in comments below, or on Twitter (@aaronlafferty).

MORE INFO (possible spoilers):


Review: “Inside Out” entertains and educates about emotions

June 19th, 2015 at 6:36 pm by under Entertainment
"Inside Out" poster courtesy Disney Pixar

“Inside Out” poster courtesy Disney Pixar

“Inside Out” (2015)
Rated: PG for mild thematic elements and some action
Runtime: 1 hour, 42 minutes
Genre: Animation/ Fantasy/ Comedy

My spoiler-free review:

In “Inside Out” we experience what goes on inside Riley’s head: her thoughts and feelings expressed through different clearly defined and memorable characters, its a movie that may help kids more easily explain their emotions.  Some of the concepts may go over the head of the youngest viewers, but even if little kids don’t connect the characters to emotions… its still an entertaining movie that the whole family can enjoy…. I give it 8.5 out of 10 … and can lead to some teachable moments down the road.

The main human emotions: Joy, Sadness, Fear, Disgust, and Anger are the main characters.  They help form memories into different colored globes, then there are more significant memories called core memories… those core memories make up “islands of personality” –  different traits that determine who she is (friendship, family, hockey, honesty, etc.).  The movie tries to explain why we have memories and thoughts pop in and out of our mind.  These are concepts that are pretty easy for an adult understand, but a little more complex for the younger crowd.  But Pixar smartly repeats it enough that it should make sense by the end of the movie for most age groups.

Amy Poehler leads the cast as the voice of Joy, Phyllis Smith voices Sadness – the emotional star of the movie, Bill Hader plays Fear keeping Riley out of danger, while Lewis Black is Anger – ready to strike at any time, and Mindy Kaling perfectly plays Disgust – who hates bad fashion and broccoli.

Kids can learn from the main concepts of emotions and memories and how they shape your personality, but they can also learn from the characters themselves: as Joy is always being  positive among the other emotions when bad things happen or bad memories are recalled; Sadness causes problems but she can’t help it – unintentionally making more of an impact than Joy and it’s affecting Riley’s overall personality; the other emotions have to take over when joy and sadness are not there to “run” things.   We also get glimpses inside the brains of mom dad and others who have similar characteristics with the same five emotions just like Riley – it’s a lesson for kids that they have the same emotions as adults – but there is a constant competition in our heads over which emotion is in charge.

During the adventure we see long term memory, imagination land and dream productions studios, the subconscious and the train of thought which transports things around inside her brain, plus we learn how some memories are forgotten.  The movie evoked giggles and “wow” from 10-year-old girl watching the movie with me.

Anger gets some of the funnier lines like “congratulations San Francisco you’ve ruined pizza” or “here comes the mom bad news train pulling in”, but Sadness gets the most impactful line though: “obsessing over the weight of our problems”.

An adventure of teachable moments: Joy needs to learn that all the emotions are important he can’t just be one or the other… it’s the same thing filmmakers hope the audience learns as well!

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Review: “Avengers: Age of Ultron” is the biggest superhero spectacle yet

April 30th, 2015 at 7:00 pm by under Entertainment
"Avengers: Age of Ultron" poster courtesy Disney-Marvel Studios

“Avengers: Age of Ultron” poster courtesy Disney-Marvel Studios

“Avengers: Age of Ultron” (2015)
Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action, violence and destruction, and for some suggestive comments
Runtime: 2 hours, 21 minutes
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

My spoiler-free review:

This is the “Empire Strikes Back” (1980) of superhero movies… a blockbuster action sequel that holds its own with the original, our heroes are in peril, they are being tested like never before, facing a grave threat, the team and individuals are being tested while the team is being pulled apart.

I give it 9.5 out of 10 … putting it in a tie with the first team up in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU): “The Avengers” (2012).

Warning for parents: there is a lot of action and some offensive language… which Captain America tries to discourage.

Super Team … the movie wastes no time getting into the action, picking up a story line that started in the Agents of SHIELD television show this week.  The opening scene showcases all 6 of the main Avengers roster doing what they do best: flying, smashing, shocking, shooting, jumping, throwing, etc.   They are the Avengers but the only time they’ve really acted like a team was during the Chitauri alien invasion on New York during the 2012 film…. now with an even more formidable foe, can they truly team up to protect Earth from destruction?   There is an undercurrent of disagreement between all of these alphas – they are heroes used to working alone and have a problem when someone else tries to lead or has a different opinion… but this friction is a battle for a future film.

The roster of main characters is huge: Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Hulk, Black Widow, Hawkeye, War Machine, Falcon, Nick Fury, and Maria Hill plus Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch, The Vision, and some cameos from characters that appeared in previous MCU movies.

Not just action… In addition to the team up… the movie combines the action and humor we’ve come to enjoy from the Marvel cinematic universe, I think that Director/Writer Joss Whedon actually takes it up a notch with the humor and definitely has a lot more action.  Whedon also added a romantic entanglement, lots of questionable decision-making, concerns of legacy for some heroes, the ominous interstellar threats.   He was also able to showcase the plethora of characters in such a crowded film… and it works so well.  There’s plenty of Stark, Rogers, Banner, and Thor… more of Barton and Romanoff… other heroes that got less screentime in other movies get more facetime too.  And Stan Lee gets another cameo.

The villain… I was worried about a CGI villain…. if the character struggles, the movie crumbles, but James Spader’s performance as Ultron is on par with a live-action villain like Loki.  Loki had some good still in him, but Spader’s Ultron is a maniacal robot bent on destruction – he’s menacing enough to warrant assembling of these great heroes.  The one flaw is that it was difficult to separate his very recognizable voice from the character – a little distracting for my age group who know Spader from his multitude of roles in TV and movies.

Lots of references: for the die hard Marvel fans there are references throughout to things that have happened and are going to happen, and there’s also ties to Disney’s Pinocchio (clever), the original Ultron from comics, Jane Foster, Pepper Potts, Asgard, Wakanda (Black Panther), and four of the six Infinity stones.

Stick around for the mid-credits scene that pushes ahead to future movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe… so be sure to stick around for it… it is a quick extra teasing the increasingly imminent threat of another alien attack.  (There was not an end credits scene in our screening, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be a Shwarma-like scene at the end of this theaterical release.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers):  (more…)

“Into the Storm” filmed in Michigan

August 8th, 2014 at 1:52 pm by under Uncategorized
"Into the Storm" poster courtesy Warner Bros

“Into the Storm” poster courtesy Warner Bros

Fictional storm movie uses Michigan as its backdrop
Originally titled “Category Six”, then filmed under the name “Black Sky”, “Into the Storm” was Directed by Steven Quale, visual effects protege of James Cameron who also directed ”Final Destination 5″ and was the second-unit director on “Avatar”.
It stars Richard Armitage (“The Hobbit”), Sarah Wayne Callies (“The Walking Dead”), Matt Walsh (“Veep”), and Max Deacon.  The premise of the movie is about “Storm trackers, thrill-seekers, and everyday townspeople document(ing) an unprecedented onslaught of tornadoes touching down in the town of Silverton”.
According to the Michigan Film Office, “Into the Storm” was awarded a $12.1 million incentive on  $40.7 million of projected spending in Michigan.
Here is my original blog on the production posted June 8, 2012……
Multi-million dollar film project coming to Michigan
Steven Quale directing "Final Destination 5"

Steven Quale directing “Final Destination 5″

The Michigan Film Office is announcing that a Warner Brothers 5-figure budget project about a devastating Tornado has been approved for the state’s film incentives and is expected to begin filmming on the eastside of the state later this summer.

The untitled tornado feature film project (originally titled “Category Six” or the script titled “Category Six”) is about a super tornado that sweeps through a small town.   The movie is expected to shoot in metro Detroit and at Michigan Motion Picture Studios in Pontiac.

The project, according to the Michigan Film Office, was awarded an incentive of $12.1 million ($12,105,139) on $40.7 million ($40,730,908) of projected in-state expenditures. The project is expected to hire 461 Michigan workers with a full time equivalent of 170 jobs.

Steven Quale, who directed “Final Destination 5″ and was the second-unit director on “Avatar” will direct the movie that IMDB says  is about “A group of high school students document the events and aftermath of a devastating tornado.”

Alycia Debnam Carey

Alycia Debnam Carey

Arlen Escarpeta

Arlen Escarpeta

Two young actors have been cast as the leads: Alycia Debnam (“The Occult”, “Dance Academy”) and Arlen Escarpeta (“The Client List”, “Final Destination 5″).

The production company Broken Road Productions says the movie is a “found-footage natural disaster movie, about high schoolers documenting a massive hurricane” and that Quale is a visual effects protege of James Cameron.

Broken Road Productions has several popular movies, and several not-so-popular movies to its credit: “Jack and Jill” (2011), “Zookeeper” (2011), “Sorcerer’s Apprentice”  (2010), “Knight and Day” (2010), “Paul Blart: Mall Cop” (2009), “Next” (2007), “Are We Done Yet?” (2007), “The Forgotten” (2004), “Anger Management” (2003), and “Radio” (2003). (more…)

Review: “How To Train Your Dragon 2″ is even better than the first!

June 19th, 2014 at 11:49 pm by under Entertainment
"How To Train Your Dragon 2" poster courtesy DreamWorks Animation

“How To Train Your Dragon 2″ poster courtesy DreamWorks Animation

“How To Train Your Dragon 2” (2014)
Rated: PG for adventure action and some mild rude humor
Runtime: 1 hour, 42 minutes
Genre: Animation/Action/Adventure

My spoiler-free review:

The story about a boy and his companion (a dragon) has grown up into something bigger and better – the story about a young man and his best friend (the dragon) and their quest to learn more about themselves.  Not only does the animation look amazing, the high quality 3D, the story, and the characters make “How To Train Your Dragon” worth every dollar you spend… I give it 9.0 out of 10!  It is one of the best movies of 2014 so far!

Warning for little kids: the movie is rated PG for adventure action and some mild rude humor, but take note that there are some scary images and sadness that may be too much for the younger audiences

Five years after “How To Train Your Dragon” (2010), the adorable dragons have moved into Berk… and the main cast has named their dragons.  Everyone has their own dragon including our main character ‘Hiccup’ (Jay Baruchel) and his dragon ‘Toothless” and his friend ‘Astrid’ (America Ferrera) and her dragon “Stormfly”.  We soon learn that the the Vikings world gets much bigger since starting to ride the dragons.   Toothless and Hiccup’s play and their chemistry is  like a boy and his pet.

It doesn’t take long for the filmmakers to establish that this is much more than a mere continuing of the 2010 story with the dragons becoming companions and part of the Viking community.  No this is about ‘Hiccup’ searching for his identity… then learning  (possible spoiler) (more…)

Review: “Edge of Tomorrow” is worth repeat viewings

June 19th, 2014 at 11:09 pm by under Entertainment
"Edge of Tomorrow" poster courtesy Warner Bros

“Edge of Tomorrow” poster courtesy Warner Bros

“Edge of Tomorrow” (2014)
Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, language and brief suggestive material
Runtime: 1 hour, 53 minutes
Genre: Action/Sci-Fi

My spoiler-free review:

In the opening minutes of “Edge of Tomorrow” we get the premise familiar to many alien invasion or disaster movies… where news media and a montague of characters are introduced to show us that something big has happened and now the world is trying to deal with it.  Those themes immediately start to set some expectations about what to expect the rest of the way.  Luckily this movie quickly shows us that its not typical… surpassing most entries in those genres by expertly combining elements of “Groundhog Day” (1993), “Source Code” (2011), the D-Day scene from “Saving Private Ryan” (1998), and many popular video games… I give it 8.5 out of 10.

Warning for parents: this movie is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, language and brief suggestive material… and many of the battlefield scenes are pretty intense… plus the main character has to deal with his mortality over and over

He’s not even supposed to be here…. Major Cage (Tom Cruise) is not a soldier… he’s a PR guy working for the military by promoting their exo-suits that are supposed to help the world defense forces fight the alien invaders that crash landed to earth five years earlier.  But where Cruise shines isn’t the fish out of water part of his character, its the smart, confident, suave, action hero that he does well at… and while the alien ‘mimics’ are his toughest challenge, he’s also got to deal with the stubborn General Brigham (Brendan Gleeson), the hard-nosed Master Sergeant Farell (Bill Paxton), and the cruel Sergeant (Terence Maynard) that he wakes up to over and over again.

Over and over… as the tag line of poster (“Live. Die. Repeat.’) implies, we’re going to relive the plot a couple times.  So the way that the story is presented to us as both familiar and new is very well conceived and executed, something that could keep even the biggest movie know-it-all guessing what will happen next.  Reminiscent of the movie “Groundhog Day”… he relives the same day a couple times before he starts to figure out how to try to change and learn from it.  The first day (loop) is longest, the second we get repeated lines, characters, and scenes.  I liked that at a certain point ‘Cage’ goes ahead in the loop and ahead of the audience on the storyline…. something that we don’t see…. but he knows what will happen if he completes the mission.

Like any good sci-fi movie: the movie sets up some basic rules for the “loop” that we can understand but there are also more complicated reasons of why this is happening that we can start to put together as the movie goes on (like why he’s reliving the day).   The look of the aliens is kept from us for awhile which was a good move, and we meet some characters that understand what he’s going through, and there are other characters just meant for helping our main character move along on the hero’s journey.  The action is immersive it feels like your in the action at times.  The solid supporting cast is mostly unknowns except for Gleeson, Paxton, and Emily Blunt as the super soldier heroine ‘Rita’.  Blunt turns in another great performance despite being a little out of her element in the action genre, she pulls it off well.

Stronger premise wins… unlike the aforementioned “Source Code” and “Oblivion”, which I mention later – this movie gets stronger as time goes on.  Often a movie’s first third is the tightest crafted and most compelling part, but this movie’s middle and final acts are stronger and support everything we’ve seen up to this point… not just headed for some twist that leaves us scratching our heads and unsatisfied.  ”Edge of Tomorrow” has an intriguing storyline that keeps us wondering what will happen next!

But … there are some moments where the CG that Cruise is put in just doesn’t look real enough… and its hard to think of the 51 year old as a spry soldier running and jumping around the battlefield.

For all his credits, Cruise has only really done 4 science fiction movies.  While the sci-fi thriller “Minority Report” (2002) is still my favorite for the actor in this genre, “Edge of Tomorrow” has become my second favorite, ahead of the remake “War of the Worlds” (2005) and far better than Cruise’s last science-fiction movie “Oblivion” (2013).  I can’t wait to rewatch this one at home for the little continuity details I may have missed the first time… and try to figure out if scenes were shot with multiple cameras or if the same scene was re-shot multiple times to give the appearance of going back to the same place… over and and over… and over… again.  Something I’ll be doing when I buy this movie: watching over and over again.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Laff’s guide to Waterfront Film Festival 2014

June 12th, 2014 at 2:19 am by under Entertainment
Waterfront Film Festival 2014 poster

Waterfront Film Festival 2014 poster by Ron English

The 16th annual Waterfront Film Festival is almost here

The Lakeshore tradition is back in South Haven for its second year!  After moving from Saugatuck the year before, the 4-day festival of film, food, music, and fun hopes for better weather (free of power outages) and attendance numbers around 16,000.   More than 70 films will be shown at the non-competitive film festival with 21 movies making Midwest premieres and 13 playing in Michigan for the first time.  The slate of movies is a mix of comedic, dramatic, and thriller feature films, thought provoking documentaries, and dozens of short films.  At many of the screenings, cast members, directors, producers, and/or writers may be present to discuss their movie and film making with the audience.

Opening night
Those thousands of people can start Thursday night with the opening night party at South Beach, gates open at 6:00pm featuring music from Tony Ferrari, Bradley Wisk, Valentiger, and Alexis.  Then at dusk, on a 50-foot inflatable screen you can watch the “Shorts Spectacular”, a screening of 6 short films.

Friday, Saturday, Sunday 
Friday morning at 9:00am the screenings begin at three locations around townSouth Haven High School (600 Elkenberg Street – 2 venues inside), Michigan Theater (210 Center Street – 3 venues inside), and Foundry Hall (422 Eagle Street) and the last movies start at 11:00pm.  There is a short film that plays in front of most movies, usually 5-10 minutes long.  The schedule is similar on Saturday and Sunday. If you don’t want to just see movies all day, you can also do some sightseeing, shopping, or eat at one of the many restaurants or eateries around the area.  Almost everything is in walking distance.  But there is also a free shuttle service if you prefer to park in one spot and then branch out to the other venues.

Get your tickets early for the Networking Event held Saturday at 2:15pm at South Haven City Hall (539 Phoenix Street).  You can meet, ask questions and get advice from celebrities and industry insiders; actors, directors, writers and producers.  Many of the names listed below will be taking part in this event.

Many well known movie, TV, and entertainment industry stars will be attending this year’s WFF, keep your eye out for:

Jason Ritter

Jason Ritter

Jason Ritter returns to Waterfront for the second time with his new movie “Wild Canaries”.  He was also here in 2009 for his movie “Peter and Vandy”.  2014 will mark the fourth time that one of his movies have screened here: also “A Bag of Hammers” (2011) and “Free Samples” (2012).  The Primetime Emmy Award nominee TV and film actor has nearly 80 credits, including in films “Freddie v. Jason”, “W.” “The East” and NBC’s hit “Parenthood”.

Melanie Lynskey Melanie Lynskey 

Melanie Lynskey returns to West Michigan with her new movie “Chu and Blossom”.

She filmed the movie “Touchback” in the Grand Rapids area in 2010.  She is an award-winning actor with more than 55 credits during the last 20 years, including “Up in the Air” with George Clooney, as Rose opposite Charlie Sheen on TV’s hit “Two and a Half Men”, with Drew Barrymore in “Ever After”, and with Kate Winslet in their explosive film debut “Heavenly Creatures” directed by Peter Jackson.

Eddie Jemison Eddie Jemison

Eddie Jemison is at Waterfront Film Festival with his new movie “Coffee, Kill Boss” as well as “King of Herrings”, for which he was the writer, director and lead actor.

He’s an actor with more than 60 credits who has worked with some of the biggest names in Hollywood. He is widely known for his role as Livingston Dell in the “Ocean’s Eleven” series opposite Brad Pitt and George Clooney, as well as roles in “Bruce Almighty” opposite Jim Carrey and “The Informant” opposite Matt Damon.

Blake Robbins  Blake Robbins

Blake Robbins is attending WFF with the film “Sublime and the Beautiful”, which he directed and stars in.

He is an actor with more than 55 credits and best known for playing Tom Halpert on the NBC hit “The Office”, as well as for his role as C.O. Dave Brass on the critically acclaimed HBO series “Oz”. He also appeared in the film “The Ugly Truth” opposite Gerard Butler.  Additionally, Blake co-authored the book “Acting Qs: Conversations with Working Actors”.

David Lascher David Lascher 

David Lascher is attending Waterfront Film Festival as the director of “Sister”.

He is an actor with more than 30 credits, including the film “White Squall” and series regular roles in “Sabrina the Teenage Witch”, “Hey Dude” and “Blossom” among others.

Christine Elise Christine Elise McCarthy

Christine Elise McCarthy has been involved with Waterfront Film Festival for years as the the festival’s programmer.

She is a well known actor, director and writer with more than 60 credits, including her recent film “Bathing & the Single Girl”, which has been expanded and adapted into a full-length memoir, as well as for main roles in “Child’s Play 2”, and on TV hits “Beverly Hills 90210” and “ER”.

Bradley Wisk Bradley Wisk

Bradley Wisk is a professional opera singer who was a contestant on “America’s Got Talent” and is a current contestant on “The Bachelorette”.

He is performing at the opening night concert.

The movies - Features
“Aboard the Carousel” (Midwest Premiere)
“Arlo and Julie” (Michigan Premiere) - Official Selection, SXSW Film Festival
“Being Awesome” (Midwest Premiere)
“BFFs” (Michigan Premiere)
“Boy Meets Girl” (Midwest Premiere)
“Cas & Dylan” (Midwest Premiere)
“Chu and Blossom” (Midwest Premiere)
“Coffee, Kill Boss” (Midwest Premiere)
“Copenhagen” (Michigan Premiere) - Audience Award, Best Narrative Feature, Slamdance Film Festival
“Craters of the Moon” (Midwest Premiere)
“Empire of Dirt”  (Midwest Premiere) - Special Jury Prize, Toronto International Film Festival
“Father-Like Son” (Midwest Premiere)
“Finding Neighbors”  (Michigan Premiere)
“I Put A Hit On You”  (Michigan Premiere)
“Jake Squared” (Michigan Premiere)
“King of Herrings” (Midwest Premiere)
“Knuckle Jack” (Midwest Premiere)
“Lawrence & Holloman” (Midwest Premiere)
“The Odd Way Home” (Michigan Premiere)
“Rezeta” (Midwest Premiere) - Grand Jury Prize, Best Narrative Feature, Slamdance Film Festival
“Sister” (Midwest Premiere) - Official selection, Tribeca Film Festival
“The Sublime and Beautiful” (Midwest Premiere) - Best Narrative Feature nominee, Slamdance Film Festival
“Wild Canaries” (Midwest Premiere)

The movies – Documentaries
Several documentaries that played at previous WFFs have gone on to receive Oscar nominations and even a win.  There are 11 feature length documentaries this year:
“Brave Miss World” (Michigan Premiere)
“Bronx Obama” (Midwest Premiere)
“Fight Church” (Michigan Premiere)
“Kidnapped For Christ” (Michigan Premiere)
“Little Hope Was Arson” – Best Documentary Feature nominee, 2014 Slamdance Film Festival
“Love Child”  (Midwest Premiere) - Grand Jury Prize Nominee, World Cinema Documentary, Sundance Film Festival
“No Cameras Allowed” (Midwest Premiere)
“Small Small Thing” (Michigan Premiere)
“This May Be the Last Time” (Midwest Premiere) – Official selection, Sundance Film Festival
“Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger” (Midwest Premiere) - Official selection, Sundance Film Festival
“Who Took Johnny” (Michigan Premiere)

More information:  (more…)

Review: “Locke” is a tense one man show

June 6th, 2014 at 8:28 am by under Entertainment
"Locke" poster courtesy A24

“Locke” poster courtesy A24

“Locke” (2014)
Rated: R for language throughout
Runtime: 1 hour, 25 minutes
Genre: Drama/Thriller

My spoiler-free review:

One man on a 90-minute drive on British freeways into London for a life-changing event sounds simple enough, but writer/director Steven Knight and actor Tom Hardy make it great!  The story, the character development, the style, the production values are all top notch and worthy of some first half of 2014 awards… I give it 8.9 out of 10.

Warning to parents: its rated R for language throughout

90 minute drives on the freeway can be boring… or white knuckle.  In this movie, we are immersed in Ivan “Locke”‘s increasingly stressful storm of problems both personal and work related… and through mostly dialogue and Hardy’s superb performance, we become about as uncomfortable as you can be without big action sequences, dizzying camera movements, or special effects…. just interpersonal drama.

We follow along as Locke drives from his work towards what is slowly revealed to us as a big deal in his life, missing out on what others in his life think are more important… and in very little time we begin to understand why he’s making the drive and why none of the other characters will probably be able to talk him out of it.

The device this movie uses has been done before, but not as well as here: one character or one cast confined to one location (inside his car) that begins to feel smaller and smaller as the story flows forward despite no physical changes to the location.  Sure he’s driving, but he spends 99% of the movie inside the vehicle, because of time and safety concerns he can’t get out, much like he can’t escape the dozens of phone calls he makes and receives during the movie, interacting with the other characters that want him to speed up, slow down, change his mind, need his help, etc.  So this device of being stuck in the car clearly comes with its own set of rules: there’s a set distance ahead of him, even going a little bit faster isn’t going to get him to his planned destination any earlier, if he wants to get there in good time, he can’t makes stops or turn around, he can’t move out of the driver’s seat, his communication is limited to his bluetooth enabled mobile phone calls, etc… its a well planned out idea that works because its so familiar to any of us who have made a lengthy trip on the interstate.

The story told in that device’s set of rules is compelling… and we get plenty of depth for both the main character and the ones we only hear…. the dialogue and the unspoken physical communication add to the sense of helplessness we have.  Hardy is great as the everyman here, its a wonderful performance to add to his growing filmography of outstanding work, one that would likely win my first half Oscars (for movies in the first 6 months of 2014).  Through his performance and Knight’s pacing that is slowly building up to the end, we are feeling his stress, his frustration, his desperation in the effort to do the right thing, especially considering his past.  He’s trapped – he can’t get comfortable – confined by his space as are we the audience in our small space in our theater seat.   The movie and Hardy are also playing on audience emotions… circumstances that most adults can understand, if not relate to… family, work, career, finances, morals – blended with themes of communication troubles and helplessness of being miles apart from the troubled situation.  As we slowly build, cracks start to show in the otherwise well put together character.  But its not just Hardy who portrays the responsible family man and dependable worker, but even the unseen characters and their actions that are vividly portrayed… like that of a top notch radio announcer perfectly painting the picture of the sports events for our imagination.

This is a much better “one man” movie than “Buried” (2010) but second only to “Duel” (1971) as the best one man driving movie (not including “Drive” (2011) because he doesn’t spend the majority of the movie in the car, or by himself).

Sure its a gamble for the entire movie to rest on the shoulders of one actor’s performance… but rest assured, Tom Hardy’s got this.

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)

Review: “Maleficent” twists the classic fairy tale

May 30th, 2014 at 12:01 am by under Entertainment
"Maleficent" poster courtesy Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

“Maleficent” poster courtesy Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

“Maleficent” (2014)
Rated: PG for sequences of fantasy action and violence, including frightening images
Runtime: 1 hour, 37 minutes
Genre: Action/Adventure/Family/Fantasy/Romance

My spoiler-free review:

From evil villain to central character, Disney turns “Sleeping Beauty” (1959) on its head 55 years later with “Maleficent” (Mah-lef-i-cent) lead by an inspired performance from Angelina Jolie and some stunning visual effects, this movie is a storybook come to life, albeit a different version – according to the narrator: the “story is not quite as you were told”…. I give it 8.0 out of 10.

Warnings: it is rated PG for sequences of fantasy action and violence, including frightening images, probably safe for kids 10 and up, depending on child

In the beginning narration of “Maleficent” we are told that they are going to “Tell A Story Anew“, which by definition means it will be different.  Not only does the movie’s title focus on the villian from the 1959 animated film, so are most of the scenes, giving us the perspective from Maleficent’s point of view and giving us a different take on why things were happening the way they did in the “Sleeping Beauty” story that has been around since first published in 1697.

Jolie was a perfect choice to play this character… morphing from good fairy and protector of her land when she was young … to the evil sorceress at the story’s iconic scenes.  She had the voice down, matching the tone and sound of Eleanor Audley from Disney’s animated version and the scene at the christening felt nearly identical to that version.  But she also gives this iconic character, described  as “one of the most powerful villains in Disney history” – a heart, a softer side, a backstory that actually makes you kind of root for the character we’ve always thought was the villain… or at least care for her and understand her emotions.  She was a protector and despite her walk down the dark path, she still has this calling to be a protector.  The movie makes Aurora’s dad – King Stefan – Sharlto Copley more of a bad guy – as the slightly deranged ruler who is obsessed with protecting his daughter and will, even as the animated version implied – stop at nothing – to protect her from the curse.  But this movie, through Copley’s capable hands, lets us see more of Stefan’s obsession and paranoia to protect his people and himself from Maleficent.  This version is certainly an interesting twist on the classic Disney fairytale this time about love, power, greed, and revenge.  Although after Jolie, Copley, and Elle Fanning (as Aurora), there was a bit of a shortage of star power for the rest of the cast.

Good marks for story, character development, and the effects.  Whether the movie becomes a new classic Disney tale remains to be seen, one thing is clear… the visual effects teams deserves an Oscar nomination.  They created a magical enchanted land with all kinds of mystical creatures from tree people, to wooden dragons, fairies, pixies, mushroom creatures, and more.  They pulled it off in a Avatar-meets storybook style that works.  The only stumble was the motion-capture or morphing they did to make the actresses playing the fairies that raise baby Aurora… but since they’re fairies… the odd look is something that can be forgiven considering the rest of the wonderful world and residents inhabiting the home of Maleficent.

Finally, this movie is familiar enough to be comfortable but different enough to keep you interested to find out how the story will end.

*Maleficent’s raven was Diablo in the 1959 animated Disney movie, the raven is Diaval in this movie
*She has a gold-looking staff in animated, constructs a staff out of wood and changes it to a solid black now
*Scene at the christening of baby Aurora seems like it was nearly word for word in-step with the 1959 version, but with a few changes, one noticable change in the spell put on the baby by Maleficent (not spoiling) and the absence of Prince Phillip (and another spoiler)
*The lopsided colorful birthday cake the fairies make for Aurora’s 16th birthday makes a brief appearance in the movie

*The fairies who protect Aurora were Flora, Fauna, and Merryweather in animated, they are Flittle, Imelda Staunton, Knotgrass, and Thistletwit in this version
*Maleficent’s minions are now more of the creatures working for her from her homeland that dark mindless goblins, trolls, etc.
*We see a lot more of the years when Aurora is in hiding, away from the castle and her name is not changed to ‘Briar Rose’
*Gives us more of a glimpse at how the spell directs Aurora to prick her finger on the spinning wheel needle
*”True love” gets a different definition just like in “Frozen” (2013)

MORE INFO (possible spoilers): (more…)